UCL Staff Survey Results: An Overworked, Underpaid, Workforce suffering a culture of bullying! Whilst VPs get bonuses

The UCL 2017 staff survey results are finally out, and what they reveal about UCL is really upsetting - it points to  an overworked, underpaid workforce with a culture of bullying:
·        I can meet the requirements of my job without regularly working excessive hours (60% disagree)
·        Compared to people working in similar roles in other organisations, I feel my pay is fair (59% disagree)
·        I have witnessed bullying/harassing behaviour at UCL in the last two years (25% agreed)


 This is the same time in which Phil Harding, UCL Director of Finance, chose (on behalf of UCL senior management) to cheer on the UUK charge to slash university pensions, as this Freedom of Information request shows. 

Not only that, but this is at a time when it has been revealed that senior managers are getting performance bonuses on top of their pay packets at UCL


Full results of survey here.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to UCL's Provost: time to catch up with the evidence!

While thousands of people involved in this strike have come to understand that the USS valuation that triggered the action is based on a fundamentally faulty methodology, our Provost shows how out of touch he is by simply reproducing the Universities UK position in a direct message to staff. His message fails to respond to the comprehensive debunking this position has very publicly received (see links at end of this blog). He has taken to issuing direct communications to staff since he faced a staff rebellion last May and this latest one is a testament to how our institutions is under the control of a Senior Management at odds with the staff of UCL and which regularly undermines the learning community that a university should be. We give our responses to his, strangely badly-researched, points below (taken uncritically from UUK) and supply a reading list with analyses that provide actual evidence and argument showing why the UUK position is deeply, deeply faulty (both substantively...
Read more

Transcript of UCU Branch Delegates Meeting 28 March 2018 - Discussing UUK Proposal

This is a transcript of the meeting that was typed in situ by a delegate in real time. It highlights some important points (in green) and the branches returning revise and resubmit or doubts feedback from their members. We have not counted delegates who changed their members response on the basis of the documents shown in the meeting - we have only counted what their members actually told them, whatever the delegate's powers of divination. Update: see Keele Branch's update in the comments below, and the York entry that has ??? can be changed to a members ballot that voted overwhelmingly to ballot the membership on the offer.
Read more

Why we are advising you to reject the UUK offer - a message from the Branch President

Why we are recommending that you reject this offer: a message from the Branch president Dear Colleague As you will have seen, an offer was received by UCU on Friday 23 March, setting out some a proposal from UUK (the employers’ organisation). This offer was quickly sent out to UCU’s membership by our General Secretary (Sally Hunt) who wanted it to go straight to ballot. This is in spite of the majority of branches around the country reporting members were confused about the content of the proposal, the definition of terms used, and what assurances we have about its outcomes. There was deep concern that this deal had not be negotiated at ACAS by our elected negotiators to improve the document or at least clarify its ambiguities. The deal is now being put to members in what can only be described as a rush. The UCL UCU branch Executive is advising that the current shape of this deal contains too many dangers, crucial ambiguities, and potential traps to be able to ...
Read more